To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: Re: +=*^
From: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Tom Jennings)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 92 13:12:06 PDT


(to: gg@well.sf.ca.us)

Thank you for clarifying my particular problem: what I was worried
about was *authentication* not security. I had the two tangled up.
Duh.

With an informal email/introducer setup for the FidoNet, we'll have a
fairly secure system with a reasonable level of authentification,
practically speaking, with authentification to some high level doable
on an individual basis. (Using PGP.)

This probably as "good as it gets" in our (email) environment.

 * Origin: World Power Systems / FidoNews / San Francisco CA (1:125/111)
--
Tom Jennings - via FidoNet node 1:125/555
    UUCP: ...!uunet!hoptoad!kumr!fidogate!111!Tom.Jennings
INTERNET: Tom.Jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG


Ref: Cypherpunks Archives (1992)
http://cypherpunks.venona.com/date/1992/10/msg00049.html
By: Tom Jennings